As being the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be attained, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of your Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the learned counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard for the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession of the subjected premises on the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to become decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this factor for interim custody of the subject premises Should the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.

thirteen . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some duration, both parties have agreed into the disposal of the moment petition over the premise that the DIGP Malir will listen to the petitioner and private respondents and will acquire care of every one of the areas of the case and make certain that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.

Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it involves legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be developed and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more

When the state court hearing the case reviews the legislation, he finds that, while it mentions large multi-tenant properties in some context, it is actually actually very obscure about whether the ninety-day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based about the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held for the ninety-day notice prerequisite, and rules in Stacy’s favor.

The legislation as founded in previous court rulings; like common law, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.

Case legislation, also used interchangeably with common law, is really a law that is based on precedents, that is the judicial decisions from previous cases, rather than regulation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case regulation uses the detailed facts of the legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.

The law of necessity identified and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it had been the illegal action called law of necessity..

Federalism also performs a major role in determining the authority of case regulation in the particular court. Indeed, Every single circuit has its very own list of binding case law. As a result, a judgment rendered during the Ninth Circuit will not be binding from the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.

The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information for being gathered with the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.

17 . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have read the realized counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession on the subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this factor for interim custody of the subject premises if the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more

Criminal cases Within the common regulation tradition, courts read more decide the regulation applicable to some case by interpreting statutes and implementing precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. As opposed to most civil regulation systems, common law systems Stick to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their have previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lower courts should make decisions constant with the previous decisions of higher courts.